2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 1961 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1961 Skoda 1200. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1961 Skoda 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Skoda 1200. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan 350Z | 1961 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | 350Z | 1200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1219 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 30 L |