2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 1972 Volvo 1800
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 1800. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 1800. (176 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan 350Z | 1972 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 350Z | 1800 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |