2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 1976 Triumph Toledo
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Toledo would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1976 Triumph Toledo. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1976 Triumph Toledo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Triumph Toledo. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Triumph Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan 350Z | 1976 Triumph Toledo | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | 350Z | Toledo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 63 L |