2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan 350Z | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Nissan | Zastava |
Model | 350Z | 750 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2010 mm |