2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 1998 Rover 400

To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.

Because 2009 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (182 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan 350Z 1998 Rover 400
Make Nissan Rover
Model 350Z 400
Year Released 2009 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3498 cc 1394 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 309 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 358 Nm 182 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95.6 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 79 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1330 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2630 mm