2009 Nissan 350Z vs. 2003 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (162 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback.

Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Outback.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan 350Z 2003 Subaru Outback
Make Nissan Subaru
Model 350Z Outback
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3498 cc 2457 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 309 HP 162 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 358 Nm 225 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95.5 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 250 km/hour 198 km/hour
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1340 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 64 L