2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 1980 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,697 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 370Z (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan 370Z | 1980 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | 370Z | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3697 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 327 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
