2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (332 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan 370Z weights approximately 784 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 370Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan 370Z | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | 370Z | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3699 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 332 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2160 mm |
