2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,697 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Nissan 370Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan 370Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 370Z (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan 370Z | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | 370Z | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3697 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 327 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
