2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan 370Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan 370Z would be higher. At 3,697 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. (288 HP @ 6350 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.

Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan 370Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan 370Z. (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan 370Z. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan 370Z has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan 370Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan 370Z 2013 Dodge CHARGER
Make Nissan Dodge
Model 370Z CHARGER
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3697 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 327 HP 288 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 8-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1905 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 7.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 11.4 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]