2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 482 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Armada | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Nissan | Wartburg |
Model | Armada | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 43 L |