2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 792 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 1967 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Armada | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5551 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 38 L |
