2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1967 ZAZ 966

To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1967 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1967 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 702 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Nissan Armada 1967 ZAZ 966
Make Nissan ZAZ
Model Armada 966
Year Released 2009 1967
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 5551 cc 886 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 27 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 522 Nm 52 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1442 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 3740 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1990 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3140 mm 2170 mm