2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 705 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Armada | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Nissan | Zastava |
Model | Armada | 850 K |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2010 mm |