2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 740 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Tercel |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2510 mm |
