2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 234 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Armada | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2680 mm |
