2009 Nissan Armada vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Armada | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2160 mm |
