2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 323 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica. 2009 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 2001 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2001 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5551 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |
