2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2002 Peugeot H2O

To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot H2O. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot H2O would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Peugeot H2O weights approximately 258 kg more than 2009 Nissan Armada.

Because 2009 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot H2O, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot H2O has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot H2O will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: