2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 92 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Nissan | Spyker |
| Model | Armada | C8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5551 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 100 L |
