2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Coupe would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 712 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Armada | Coupe |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 5551 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 33 L |
