2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Caprice.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Armada | 2006 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5551 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
