2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Armada | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
Model | Armada | Stavic |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 80 L |