2009 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (296 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 486 kg more than 2009 Nissan Armada.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo X670. (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo X670.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Armada | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Armada | X670 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1928 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |