2009 Nissan Cube vs. 1966 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Volkswagen 1600. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1966 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1966 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volkswagen 1600. (110 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volkswagen 1600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Cube | 1966 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Cube | 1600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 110 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |