2009 Nissan Cube vs. 1970 Rover P5B
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Rover P5B (159 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1970 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1970 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Cube | 1970 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Cube | P5B |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3528 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 159 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2820 mm |
