2009 Nissan Cube vs. 1978 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 has manual transmission. 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Cube | 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cube | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 26 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1940 mm |
