2009 Nissan Cube vs. 2000 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Opa (150 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Opa (200 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Opa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Cube | 2000 Toyota Opa | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cube | Opa |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
