2009 Nissan Cube vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Cube. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Cube would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (171 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (232 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford E-350 has manual transmission. 2010 Ford E-350 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Cube | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cube | E-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 232 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 62 L |