2009 Nissan Cube vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Cube. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Cube would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Transit Connect (136 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Transit Connect (173 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Transit Connect will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Cube | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cube | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 136 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 173 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 58 L |