2009 Nissan Cube vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Cube. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Cube would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Cube | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cube | XC70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |