2009 Nissan GT-R vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 619 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan GT-R | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | GT-R | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 310 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |
