2009 Nissan Livina vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Livina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Livina would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Livina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Livina. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Livina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Livina | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Livina | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |