2009 Nissan Micra vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Nissan Micra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Micra weights approximately 342 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Micra | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Micra | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |