2009 Nissan Murano vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1388 kg more than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Murano | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Murano | E-Series |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.06:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 150 L |