2009 Nissan NP300 vs. 1986 Skoda L
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1986 Skoda L. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1986 Skoda L.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Skoda L. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Skoda L. (90 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan NP300 | 1986 Skoda L | |
| Make | Nissan | Skoda |
| Model | NP300 | L |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
