2009 Nissan NP300 vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. Both 2009 Nissan NP300 and 1996 Proton 400 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (112 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan NP300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications: