2009 Nissan NP300 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan NP300 has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan NP300 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | NP300 | F1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
