2009 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Audi A3
To start off, 2013 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (310 HP) has 113 more horse power than 2013 Audi A3. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2013 Audi A3.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (526 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Audi A3. (281 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Audi A3 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Pathfinder | A3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 526 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4292 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1995 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1423 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |