2009 Nissan Qashqai vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Qashqai is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Qashqai (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Qashqai should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 746 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Qashqai | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Nissan | Zastava |
Model | Qashqai | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2160 mm |