2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 546 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Because 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Rogue | 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Rogue | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 6229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 81 L |