2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1970 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Stag. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 354 kg more than 1970 Triumph Stag. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue. 2009 Nissan Rogue has automatic transmission and 1970 Triumph Stag has manual transmission. 1970 Triumph Stag will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Rogue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Rogue | 1970 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Nissan | Triumph |
| Model | Rogue | Stag |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 63 L |
