2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 84 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Rogue | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Rogue | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |