2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Rogue | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Rogue | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4690 mm |
