2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 490 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Rogue | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Rogue | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2450 mm |
