2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 449 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Rogue | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Rogue | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |