2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 6 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Rogue | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Rogue | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |