2009 Nissan Rogue vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Rogue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Rogue would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Expedition (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1323 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Expedition. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Expedition (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Rogue | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Rogue | Expedition |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 2652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2332 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |