2009 Nissan Titan vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,549 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2009 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Titan | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Titan | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 5549 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2160 mm |
