2009 Nissan Titan vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (522 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (407 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Nissan Titan | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Titan | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 87 L |